UPHJS2014 Edit 18 --
375
39. Which Section of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act Provides correction of clerical or arithmetical errors.
(A) Section 41 A
(B) Section 44 A
(C) Section 42 A
(D) None of the above
Answer
Please Login / Register to view
UPHJS2014 Edit 18 --
375
40. What is the limitation provided under section 52 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 for moving representation by the tenure holders for Chak road and chak gul after notification issued under sub-section (1) of section 52 of the Act.
(A) 90 days
(B) 30 days
(C) Six month
(D) None of the above
Answer
Please Login / Register to view
UPHJS2014 Edit 18 --
375
41. What is the minimum percentage of total number of tenure holders on whose representation the collector can provide chak road or chak gul after notification under sub section (1) of section 52 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holding Act, 1953
(A) Twenty percent
(B) Fifty percent
(C) Ten percent
(D) None of the above
Answer
Please Login / Register to view
UPHJS2014 Edit 18 --
375
42. Which full bench decision of this court has held Deputy Director of Consolidation has no power of review his judgement.
(A) Ram Kumar V. State of U.P. & others 2005 (99) RD 823
(B) Smt Guddi V. State of U.P. & others 1997 2 UPLBEC 872
(C) Smt. Shiv Raji and others v. Deputy Director of Consolidation and others 1997 (88) RD 562
(D) Daya Ram Singh v. State of U.P. 2007 (3) ESC 1760
Answer
Please Login / Register to view
UPHJS2014 Edit 18 --
375
42. Which full bench decision of this court has held Deputy Director of Consolidation has no power of review his judgement.
(A) Ram Kumar V. State of U.P. & others 2005 (99) RD 823
(B) Smt Guddi V. State of U.P. & others 1997 2 UPLBEC 872
(C) Smt. Shiv Raji and others v. Deputy Director of Consolidation and others 1997 (88) RD 562
(D) Daya Ram Singh v. State of U.P. 2007 (3) ESC 1760
Answer
Please Login / Register to view