UPHJS2018-2
Main Exam

Q.1 Discuss the distinction of relevancy and admissibility of scientific techniques, like polygraph test, narco analysis test and DNA test as applied to the cases involving law of paternity as against criminal law with special reference to the ratio of the decision in the case of Selvi and others vs. State of Karnataka (2010) 7 SCC 263. [10 Marks]

Answer and Notes

UPHJS2012
Pre. Exam

67. The opinion of expert may be obtained under Section 40 of the Evidence Act in relation to-
(A) Science, Art, Law, Finger impression and handwriting/signature
(B) Science including medical matters, Art, Law, Finger impression and handwriting
(C) Science, including medical matters, Art, Law, Finger impression, handwriting and signatures
(D) Science, Art, Foreign law, Finger impression and handwriting/signature. —

Answer and Notes Answer is D



UPHJS2014
Pre. Exam

100. Expert opinion is relevant under section -------- of the Indian Evidence Act.
(A) Section 41
(B) Section 43
(C) Section 44
(D) Section 45

Answer and Notes Answer is D

UPHJS2016
Pre. Exam

1. Opinion of Expert is :
(a) a conclusive proof
(b) relevant
(c) supportive & corroborative
(d) both (b) and (c)

Answer and Notes Answer is D


Sandeep : According to section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 when the Court has to form an opinion upon a point of foreign law or of science or art, or as to identity of handwriting or finger impressions, the opinions upon that point of persons specially skilled in such foreign law, science or art, or in questions as to identity of handwriting or finger impressions are relevant facts.


UPHJS2009
Pre. Exam

85. Opinion of Experts is relevant under-
(A) Section 45 of Evidence Act
(B) Section 46 of Evidence Act
(C) Both the above
(D) None of the above

Answer and Notes Answer is A